Ohio Senate Bill 268 Guts Ohio’s Laws Prohibiting Discrimination against Women, Older Workers, Employees with Disabilities, Veterans, Minorities and Religious Employees
The Ohio Employment Lawyers' Association has released an analysis of Senate Bill 268, introduced in 2016. The full analysis is here.
For Immediate Release:
Fred Gittes, President
Protecting Ohio’s Employees
Summary of Key Provisions
The bill to amend Ohio’s anti-discrimination laws is a transparent and cynical attempt to prevent employers and managers from being held accountable for harassment or discrimination directed at women, older workers, employees with even blatant disabilities, military veterans, minorities, or religious employees. In fact, the bill bans any lawsuits against individual managers, company officers, and even some entire companies for overt sexual harassment or intentional discrimination under the state’s anti-discrimination laws, prevents all lawsuits against individual managers and officers who retaliate against employees for reporting discrimination, and, because of the way it strips key protective language out of the current law, even the largest corporate wrongdoers could use it to avoid any legal responsibility for illegal acts committed by their managers and other authorized agents.
The bill makes discrimination cheap for employers through severe limits on what employees can recover for intentional discrimination or harassment. If this bill becomes law, the recoveries available to women, employees with disabilities, older workers, religious employees, military veterans, and minorities for intentional discrimination and even the most vicious harassment will be different and far lower than those allowed in virtually all other types of lawsuits. The bill also imposes extremely short deadlines on employees to file suit in court, and in some cases, employees could have as little as one day to file suit after being notified of a finding by the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.
Worse, the bill applies its extremely short time limits and severe caps on compensation only to employees—not employers. In other words, while employees will face one of the shortest time limits in Ohio law for filing a legal claim and the most severe caps on compensation for proven wrongdoing, none of these draconian provisions would apply to lawsuits filed by employers—even when they sue their own employees.
SB 268 creates new limitations that do not exist under numerous federal civil rights laws or existing Ohio law. It eliminates remedies and protections that have been the law of Ohio for many years and are consistent with federal laws. The bill does not harmonize state anti-discrimination laws with federal civil rights laws, as has been claimed. Finally, it even tries to prevent the public and employees from having access to previously available information about allegations of employment discrimination by sealing many of the investigations of the Ohio Civil Rights Commission even after the Commission has issued its initial determination.
Click Here for the Full Analysis
OELA Press Releases
- Ohio Senate Bill 268 Guts Ohio’s Laws Prohibiting Discrimination against Women, Older Workers, Employees with Disabilities, Veterans, Minorities and Religious EmployeesFeb 24, 2016
- Legislation Robs Women, Minorities and People with Disabilities of Protections Against Discrimination and Harassment in the WorkplaceFeb 3, 2016
- Ohio Senator Coley Introduces Bill to protect Sexual PredatorsOct 20, 2012
- Another Attack on Ohio Workers: Draft Bill Seeks to Gut Ohio’s Laws Prohibiting Sex, Age, Race, Disability and Other Forms of Discrimination by Eliminating Protections for Most Ohio WorkersDec 9, 2011
- OELA Opposes Ohio Chamber Legislation Gutting Civil Rights ProtectionsOct 24, 2011
- 5th Circuit tosses challenge to Texas law banning the harboring of immigrants here illegally3 days ago from ABA Journal
- Judge allows one prior accuser to testify in Cosby sexual assault trial3 days ago from ABA Journal
- Latham’s revenue in 2016 is the highest ever for a law firm; equity partner profits top $3M3 days ago from ABA Journal
- Law profs seek ethics probe of lawyer Kellyanne Conway; ‘Bowling Green Massacre’ statement is cited3 days ago from ABA Journal
- Magistrate judge denies boilerplate warrant request for forced fingerprint unlocking of iPhones3 days ago from ABA Journal